From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5513162A4A for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3967F13339 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0.it-functions.nl (mx0.it-functions.nl [178.32.167.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1C63313329 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.100.26.194] (helo=daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl) by mx0.it-functions.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9bGl-0000Lx-Hb for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:47 +0200 Received: from [192.168.254.32] by daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1k9bGi-0006df-Ua for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:44 +0200 To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com From: Stephan Leemburg Organization: IT Functions Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:41:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: nl X-Scan-Signature: b95c0c47e62695fb4550b2fffab5f14d X-GeoIP: NL X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav-new X-Scan-Signature: b7a1c818b0e58e4768e5bb6b86c529d8 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [config.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] More than 10 interfaces in lxc containers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:41:49 -0000 Hi @dev, I have read about other people who need more than 10 network interfaces in their lxc containers. For me, I have that need too for a firewall container. I think it is not so difficult to raise the 10 upto 32. Just change /usr/share/pve-manager/js/pvemanagerlib.js in Ext.define('PVE.lxc.NetworkView', { the line me.down('button[name=addButton]').setDisabled((records.length >= 10)); to me.down('button[name=addButton]').setDisabled((records.length >= 32)); And in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm change my $MAX_LXC_NETWORKS = 10; to my $MAX_LXC_NETWORKS = 32; As far as I can see, that is enough. Would you please consider raising the limit? Would you like me to send in a patch file or pull request. Or is the above sufficient. Thanks and kind regards, Stephan