From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A296DEA0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CEC09244E2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 639E4244D7 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 35E0842866 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:44:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:99.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/99.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Matthias Heiserer , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20220324113331.681971-1-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> <71df5a51-c6d8-55d0-af6f-7815f1c77ec8@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.056 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 1/2] Utils: add calculate max button width hack X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:44:47 -0000 On 28.03.22 11:43, Matthias Heiserer wrote: > On 25.03.2022 09:47, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> On 24.03.22 12:33, Matthias Heiserer wrote: >>> The same code is used once in widget toolkit and twice in PVE already, >>> so it makes sense to add it as a separate function. >>> >> >> FWIW, there'd be also the possibility of adding a new button class, derived >> from proxmoxButton, that would be a bit more boilerplate but also avoid having a >> rather specific helper in the general utils class and avoid coupling from property >> existance/behavior over such "code distance". Maybe we could also move some more >> common "AltButton" behavior in there though (did not checked too closely). >> What do you think? >> > Not a big fan tbh, as would mean it can't be used with an Ext.button. Not seeing the problem? You just use the derived xtype which *is* a Ext.button, we alreay use an also derived variant in the respective places anyway (proxmoxButton) so not sure which problems you envision...