From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F066E78111 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DC6C31B7B7 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6B4E21B7A9 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 473D4464A1; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Alexandre Derumier References: <20210429111759.231197-1-aderumier@odiso.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210429111759.231197-1-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [qinqplugin.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v2 pve-network 0/3] zones: qinq : fix mutiples vnets/qinq zones X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:32:43 -0000 On 29.04.21 13:17, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > This fix bugs with qinq when vmbr0 is ovs or classic bridge, > when we define multiple vnets/qinq zones > > changelog v2: > - fix typo in vlanaware test > > Alexandre Derumier (3): > zones: qinq: ovs: fix duplicate ovs_ports with multiple zones/vnets > zones: qinq: classic bridge: fix bridge zone name with multiple > zones/vnets > zones: qinq: vlanaware bridge: add tests with multiple vnets/zones > > PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/QinQPlugin.pm | 10 +++--- > .../zones/qinq/bridge/expected_sdn_interfaces | 33 +++++++++++++++++-- > test/zones/qinq/bridge/sdn_config | 7 +++- > .../bridge_vlanaware/expected_sdn_interfaces | 20 +++++++++++ > test/zones/qinq/bridge_vlanaware/sdn_config | 7 +++- > .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- > .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- > test/zones/qinq/ovs/expected_sdn_interfaces | 28 +++++++++++++++- > test/zones/qinq/ovs/sdn_config | 7 +++- > 9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > applied series, thanks! Do you have other stuff pending, else I can do a version bump and roll out now?