From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EECEC0AB3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:58:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 660CF1EBC6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:57:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:57:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E28F44690
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:57:43 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <d02f3dad-4082-42ec-8a54-813937532b91@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:57:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
References: <20240111165826.804669-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240111165826.804669-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [sourceware.org]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] lvm: avoid warning due to
 human-readable text in vgs output
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:58:14 -0000

Am 11.01.24 um 17:58 schrieb Friedrich Weber:
> 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=blob;f=lib/format_text/archive.c;h=5acf0c04a;hb=38e0c7a1#l222
> 

>  222                 log_print_unless_silent("Consider pruning %s VG archive with more then %u MiB in %u files (see archiving settings in lvm.conf).",
>  223                                         vgname, (unsigned)sum, archives_size);

Can we pass a silent flag when invoking the command instead?