From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9CD69DA9 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8271B2D230 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CC75B2D226 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 89E5B43620; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:49 +0100 (CET) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Alexandre Derumier References: <20201115183609.3022395-1-aderumier@odiso.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/83.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201115183609.3022395-1-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.344 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-kernel] add patch: vhost: bump max_mem_regions to 509 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:25:50 -0000 On 15.11.20 19:36, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > Currently, default value is 64, so qemu is limited to 64 hotplug dimm >=20 > original patch from 2015 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/kvm/patch/1438180163-275465-3-git-= send-email-imammedo@redhat.com/ >=20 > We have discusted about this in 2016 (At this time some optimisations p= atches were missing) > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2016-December/024502.html= >=20 What is wrong with setting it as module option? https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2016-December/024508.html > Also, this fix this bugzilla > https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1426 >=20 > Wolfgang proposed to have explicit dimm module management, it could be = great, > but for now this patch is fixed the current implemlentation. >=20 >=20 maybe Stefan gets around to make this all a nicer approach? https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2016-December/024519.html >=20 > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier > --- > ...08-vhost-bump-max_mem_regions-to-509.patch | 32 +++++++++++++++++++= > submodules/ubuntu-focal | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 patches/kernel/0008-vhost-bump-max_mem_regions-to-5= 09.patch snip > diff --git a/submodules/ubuntu-focal b/submodules/ubuntu-focal > index fd386a6..721ac24 160000 > --- a/submodules/ubuntu-focal > +++ b/submodules/ubuntu-focal > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -Subproject commit fd386a64a1ed3f2f047318508ebd733f56a4fab2 > +Subproject commit 721ac248403a4c7ea98c416fc28f22c0bfbbb63d >=20 above hunk for the submodule shouldn't be included in the patch, it refer= s to a git object which is not in ubuntus tree, probably only local in your wo= rking tree.