From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8493C0AB5 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:09:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C12E31EE03 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:09:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:09:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EAD0545316 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:09:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:09:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Fiona Ebner , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20240111165826.804669-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Friedrich Weber In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.103 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [sourceware.org] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] lvm: avoid warning due to human-readable text in vgs output X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:55 -0000 On 12/01/2024 09:57, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 11.01.24 um 17:58 schrieb Friedrich Weber: >> >> [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=blob;f=lib/format_text/archive.c;h=5acf0c04a;hb=38e0c7a1#l222 >> > >> 222 log_print_unless_silent("Consider pruning %s VG archive with more then %u MiB in %u files (see archiving settings in lvm.conf).", >> 223 vgname, (unsigned)sum, archives_size); > > Can we pass a silent flag when invoking the command instead? Good point. A quick test shows passing `-q` does not suppress the message, but passing `-qq` does. Documentation on `-qq` [1]: > -q|--quiet ... > Suppress output and log messages. Overrides --debug and --verbose. Repeat once to also suppress any prompts with answer 'no'. Not sure if automatically answering prompts with 'no' might cause problems -- I don't think I've ever seen a yes/no prompt by `vgs` though. What do you think? [1] https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/lvm2/vgs.8.en.html