From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944E2913A9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Apr 2024 15:09:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E95418846
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Apr 2024 15:08:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Apr 2024 15:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 891E044D41
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Apr 2024 15:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <cfae579f-2214-43f4-86bd-40fbd364fc03@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:08:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20240402171629.536804-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <mailman.56.1712124362.450.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
 <0e92f09d-6bd4-49f3-ac68-1845f33d1a6c@proxmox.com>
 <mailman.77.1712145853.450.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
 <94141915-bcfe-4fe5-b3f5-b17e19f95762@proxmox.com>
 <mailman.78.1712149473.450.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.78.1712149473.450.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.582 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC
 container/firewall/manager/proxmox-firewall/qemu-server 00/37] proxmox
 firewall nftables implementation
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:09:21 -0000



On 4/3/24 15:04, DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel wrote:
> I think you can just use DROP for this kind of traffic, as anyway, you
> don't expect to receive a response like tcp-reset or icmp port
> unreachable.

Yes, of course, replied too quickly without thinking twice...