From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179B37CEA0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:22:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1551B2BDD2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:22:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 55BE542644
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <ce2aa59d-b655-1079-9d6a-ece61b6a0050@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:22:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/103.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20220719081931.63413-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220719081931.63413-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied:  [PATCH v2 qemu] add two more stable patches
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:22:58 -0000

Am 19/07/2022 um 10:19 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> For the io_uring patch, it's not very clear which configurations can
> trigger it, but it should be rather uncommon. See qemu commit
> be6a166fde652589761cf70471bcde623e9bd72a for a bit more information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
>     * Cherry-pick io_uring patch instead of taking it from mail (was
>       applied upstream in the meantime).
>     * Include patch for e1000 issue.
> 
>  ...20-io_uring-fix-short-read-slow-path.patch | 49 +++++++++++
>  ...criptor-status-in-a-separate-operati.patch | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/patches/series                         |  2 +
>  3 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0020-io_uring-fix-short-read-slow-path.patch
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0021-e1000-set-RX-descriptor-status-in-a-separate-operati.patch
> 
>

applied, thanks!