From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80419507B
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:08:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CCDF335652
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 183F744C47
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <ccb7b09f7e9687e8da1989a6ac92e4ad3e445e29.camel@proxmox.com>
From: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development
discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:07:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <882a1c6e-46cc-4dbb-8ad0-c52c9e5f8b30@proxmox.com>
References: <20240322135933.164404-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
<20240322135933.164404-2-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
<882a1c6e-46cc-4dbb-8ad0-c52c9e5f8b30@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.102 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/9] report: add `jobs.cfg` to debug
related network/load/backup/etc issues
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:08:00 -0000
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 09:08 +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> > > > On 22/03/2024 14:59, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
> > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0PVE/Report.pm | 1 +
> > > > > > > > =C2=A01 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/PVE/Report.pm b/PVE/Report.pm
> > > > > > > > index d4191769..6014f13e 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/PVE/Report.pm
> > > > > > > > +++ b/PVE/Report.pm
> > > > > > > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ my $init_report_cmds =3D sub {
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 'pveversion --verbose',
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 'cat /etc/hosts',
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 'pvesubscription get',
> > > > > > > > + 'cat /etc/pve/jobs.cfg',
> > > >=20
> > > > This does not really fits the general section, and makes it harder =
to
> > > > see the core subscription and repository state. I'd either add it t=
o the
> > > > cluster one, as cluster-wide jobs config, or to a new "Jobs" sectio=
n,
> > > > with a slight preference to the latter.=20
A new "jobs" section would indeed be more appropriate.
> > > >=20
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 'cat /etc/apt/sources.list',
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 sub { dir2text('/etc/apt/sources.list.d/', '.+\.lis=
t') },
> > > > > > > > =C2=A0 sub { dir2text('/etc/apt/sources.list.d/', '.+\.sou=
rces') },
> > > >=20