From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A6362E96 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:37:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3E6B229CC for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:36:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CA039229BB for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:36:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9AE6045B88 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:36:50 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Fabian Ebner References: <20200929083705.20124-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:36:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/82.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200929083705.20124-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.159 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [vzdump.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH-SERIES v5] fix #2649: introduce prune-backups property for storages supporting backups X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:37:22 -0000 On 29.09.20 10:37, Fabian Ebner wrote: > Make use of the new 'prune-backups' storage property with vzdump. > > Changes from v4: > * drop already applied patches > * rebase on current master > * fix typo > * add newline to error message > > Fabian Ebner (2): > Allow prune-backups as an alternative to maxfiles > Always use prune-backups instead of maxfiles internally > > PVE/API2/VZDump.pm | 4 +-- > PVE/VZDump.pm | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > for the record: I have to admit that I did no big testing rounds with this, but the previous was, besides of the faulty fallback, OK IIRC and the fallback stuff was fixed, so... applied, thanks!