From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE12492F04 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:38:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B88E55E08 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:38:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:38:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A48F4442C3; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:38:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:37:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Eneko Lacunza , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220831132803.5596-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <26cef061-6d28-1d8b-b7a7-5810054ff023@proxmox.com> <13967647-13df-0567-0870-3cd7aa461fa6@proxmox.com> <536bbaea-9f39-0b96-e16e-70c04c0852a5@binovo.es> <1ca8041f-5099-ad72-9c86-ddc86c1aafff@binovo.es> <4530687c-86ea-e9f6-c932-7f1f702d6647@binovo.es> Cc: Thomas Lamprecht From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.837 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.583 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC kernel] revert problematic TSC multiplier commit X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:38:38 -0000 Am 14.09.22 um 11:38 schrieb Eneko Lacunza: > Hi, > > El 14/9/22 a las 10:40, Eneko Lacunza escribió: >> >> El 14/9/22 a las 9:50, Fiona Ebner escribió: >>> Am 05.09.22 um 10:25 schrieb Eneko Lacunza: >>>> I just confirmed that in addition to issue reported in >>>> https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4073 (live migrated VM hung >>>> using 100% CPU), we also reproduce issue reported in >>>> >>>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/zeitspr%C3%BCnge-in-vms-seit-pve-7-2.112756/ >>>> >>>> At least what I understand google translating it :) >>>> >>>> - From 5.15.39-4-pve (Ryzen 2600X) to 5.15.39-4-pve (Ryzen 1700): Problems >>>> * Migration of a VM hung 4 other VMs in destination host (no 100% CPU use, consoles show time related issues, watchdog, etc.). >>>> >>>> We can test the patch if you can provide a kernel .deb package. >>>> >>> Hi, >>> a kernel package for 5.19 is available in all repositories now [0]. The >>> fix for the TSC multiplier issue is included there. >>> >>> [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/115090/ >> >> Thanks, I'll try to test today and will report back. > > I just made a kick test and 5.19.7-1 kernel continues to have issues for > us (tried live migration of 5 VMs from 5.13 to 5.19, 4 VMs froze using > 100% CPU). IIUC, the migrated VMs themselves hung? Is the other issue with causing time jumps and CPU stalls in *other* VMs now gone? I'm not sure if a fix for the FPU-related issue is present in this kernel or still outstanding, likely @Thomas knows?