From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754FE82E84 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6ECB8F527 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B6908F518 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:54:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E3D544CDF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:54:13 +0100 (CET) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Oguz Bektas References: <20211129123858.1320223-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> From: Dylan Whyte Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:54:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211129123858.1320223-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.440 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.977 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, config.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] config: allow 'lazytime' mount option for containers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:54:14 -0000 Hi, I just tested/played with this a bit and couldn't find any issues within the container, with the option enabled. However, you need to add a corresponding mount option in the GUI, as otherwise, the "Edit: Mount Point" window breaks due to it not recognizing the option, and no changes can be made as a result. Tested-by: Dylan Whyte On 11/29/21 1:38 PM, Oguz Bektas wrote: > requested in community forum [0] > > root@CT1022:/# mount | grep lazy > /var/lib/pve/local-btrfs/images/1022/vm-1022-disk-0/disk.raw on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,lazytime) > /var/lib/pve/local-btrfs/images/1022/vm-1022-disk-0/disk.raw on /snap type ext4 (rw,relatime,lazytime) > > [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/100454/ > > Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas > --- > src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > index 1e28a88..6c2acd6 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ sub __snapshot_rollback_get_unused { > cfs_register_file('/lxc/', \&parse_pct_config, \&write_pct_config); > > > -my $valid_mount_option_re = qr/(noatime|nodev|nosuid|noexec)/; > +my $valid_mount_option_re = qr/(noatime|lazytime|nodev|nosuid|noexec)/; > > sub is_valid_mount_option { > my ($option) = @_;