From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F054C92021 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:00:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C990D3B8BF for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:00:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:00:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 02E8A49382 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:00:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:00:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner To: Markus Frank , Proxmox VE development discussion Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20231108085254.53574-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> <20231108085254.53574-3-m.frank@proxmox.com> <38d62435-50ed-48ac-96f5-932e2be9e2c7@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.073 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common v8 2/7] add Dir mapping config X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:00:34 -0000 Am 31.01.24 um 14:53 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 31.01.24 um 14:42 schrieb Markus Frank: > > >>> >>> What could also be mentioned for xattr and acl: do the underlying file >>> systems need to support these? What happens if they don't? >> ACLs and xattrs just get ignored if not supported. > > > Please include that in the description, thanks! > But wait, in the docs you say that you need to disable the setting for Windows to make it work. So it's not simply ignored, at least not in all cases. And I guess this is also the reason why there are overrides for xattr and acl in the VM configuration (or why else would we need those rather than just using the setting from the mapping)?