From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878F160839
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:37:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 71E911AF46
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:37:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8C37A1AF3A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:37:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CF0046C3D;
 Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:37:54 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c6956240-2ac8-c73d-0dbd-4e1f38caefa2@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:37:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/96.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ko=c4=87?= <daniel@xn--ko-wla.pl>
References: <20220107090147.3619156-1-daniel@xn--ko-wla.pl>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220107090147.3619156-1-daniel@xn--ko-wla.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-i18n] Polish translation update
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:37:55 -0000

On 07.01.22 10:01, Daniel Ko=C4=87 wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Ko=C4=87 <daniel@xn--ko-wla.pl>
> ---
>  pl.po | 486 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------=

>  1 file changed, 188 insertions(+), 298 deletions(-)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!