From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220421FF15F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:11:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6C84A14857;
	Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:11:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c3307742-9eb1-4af1-b37b-9abb968d7565@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:11:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20241118114134.83882-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <20241118114134.83882-3-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <2bf7ebfb-f046-4138-916c-2a333ddc993f@proxmox.com>
 <f567daa7-5c9a-487b-b598-4b1e96f24a14@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <f567daa7-5c9a-487b-b598-4b1e96f24a14@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.656 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-firewall v5 2/5] add support for loading
 sdn firewall configuration
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 11/18/24 17:09, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 18.11.24 um 15:24 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
>> I think we should *always* load the whole configuration here and filter
>> which IPSets we output in the API methods instead (by invoking
>> load_sdn_conf there explicitly and updating the cluster_conf hash).
> 
> sounds good to me, are you already working on that for a v8?

yes, indeed


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel