From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356AB710F4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1ECDADA7A for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 67ABADA6A for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2C19E45868; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/88.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Chris Hofstaedtler References: <20210406184828.y23ajkfqgfazk4qk@zeha.at> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210406184828.y23ajkfqgfazk4qk@zeha.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Fwd: Bug#986371: Indeed this should work (also adding trivial test-case) X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:02:54 -0000 Hi, On 06.04.21 20:48, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > I believe you'll find Debian bug #986371 of interest. In Kernels > 5.10+ the "guest time" accounting appears to be broken, in both > Debian and Ubuntu. See https://bugs.debian.org/986371 for further > details. > Thanks for sharing, appreciated! I'll keep an eye on that bug and potential fixes like "KVM: X86: Properly account for guest CPU time when considering context tracking" [0]. cheers, Thomas [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1617011036-11734-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com/