From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD20F6B6E8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:15:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2DAA1BA52
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:15:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A44CB1BA42
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:15:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6895E4611E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:15:32 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Alwin Antreich <a.antreich@proxmox.com>
References: <20201216115904.2790788-1-a.antreich@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <c23b1d36-d749-6834-8f7c-ed1db296186c@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:15:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/85.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201216115904.2790788-1-a.antreich@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.065 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [nfsplugin.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage] fix: check connection for nfs
 v4 only server
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:15:33 -0000

On 16.12.20 12:59, Alwin Antreich wrote:
> the check_connection is done by querying the exports of the nfs server
> in question. With nfs v4 those exports aren't listed anymore since nfs
> v4 employs a pseudo-filesystem starting from root (/).
> 
> rpcinfo allows to query the existence of an nfs v4 service.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich <a.antreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Note: scan_nfs will not work with nfs v4 only, since it also employs
>       showmount. The path has to be provided manually.
> 
>  PVE/Storage/NFSPlugin.pm | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!