From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6749265D for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:06:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D6E1C183B7 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:06:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:06:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F97B41BE3 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:06:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:06:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/105.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Fabian Ebner References: <20220506101114.45522-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220506101114.45522-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [RFC qemu-server] api: create disks: avoid adding secondary cloud-init drives X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:06:11 -0000 Am 06/05/2022 um 12:11 schrieb Fabian Ebner: > This will break possibly existing workflows like > 1. add second cloud-init > 2. remove first cloud-init > to change the cloud-init storage. > > On the other hand, it avoids unintended misconfiguration of having > mutliple cloud-init drives with potentially different settings. > > Also in preparation for adding cloud-init-related API calls, where > not being able to assume that there's only one cloud-init drive/state > would complicate things quite a bit. > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner > --- > > Are there any scenarios where having multiple cloud-init drives is > useful? > > PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > PVE/QemuConfig.pm | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+) > > applied, thanks!