From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74E7BAC70 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:43:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9FC7C1C9A6 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A81E440AB6 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:43:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:43:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20240320085621.38773-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240320085621.38773-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] system-requirements: mention that SSDs with PLP should be used X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:43:35 -0000 v2 is on the list https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-March/062296.html On 2024-03-20 09:56, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer > --- > pve-system-requirements.adoc | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/pve-system-requirements.adoc b/pve-system-requirements.adoc > index bc3689d..4db5358 100644 > --- a/pve-system-requirements.adoc > +++ b/pve-system-requirements.adoc > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ Recommended System Requirements > (BBU) or non-RAID for ZFS and Ceph. Neither ZFS nor Ceph are compatible with a > hardware RAID controller. > ** Shared and distributed storage is possible. > +** SSDs with Power-Loss-Protection (PLP) are recommended for good performance. > + Using consumer SSDs is discouraged. > > * Redundant (Multi-)Gbit NICs, with additional NICs depending on the preferred > storage technology and cluster setup.