From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F57862878 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:09:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8056C19AA5 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:09:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B78A819A90 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:09:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id c12so13968773wrc.7 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:09:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=vFQppF88BpPYxRbh1GeI2DhD7hJ72UABihdXPE2v/CY=; b=PPWJipM7l/qCiR2bVTVyU4qwnRWh0SCMF5/7bcvBqflGR+fmNQtpgwMEJpcjOHvqHv ZLsYKCQ5IQgH3rBH95ZoS8VKra2Le8Lz1+6JSs7ZPg7uDDqQasn1IGDk53agQuFPpqac 6k0coHDjFJxnzzeoeYI51Kgk/vjtOMsBjG2YLIbm5Nw0P4PcRL/SIIPtwrJnopAY84mo rCQK9am5YYSVw9ZtCNI/NBN9Qa84A+PpAeIJWn46kUhROY4pjkWz5d6XWhfAZ7hy2e5N hvQMxt8Ku7ae8QFdlQgll3EacOgNmDXMZW9rY4WFicf9DnOb2YM3ML8sXS8joPrxJGBC OZuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vFQppF88BpPYxRbh1GeI2DhD7hJ72UABihdXPE2v/CY=; b=GDQwXr85CCYwqza44oXGVInaEuGQndNKU7ksPCa9UehMWat0iNfNt/OAglFTD0Kwb/ Pt+RHXsp6nTE49OD3L6T51gndI1f2n/1jW2qFNwljK1F+EvmW1zMed4MIz5iqA0M4b+U wIhlroyxD/DrgKHFdtu/qlTwGW/eVAxeobxNMlY5FS1gd3oxLlkiIaEwtJTgxLf1ojIA XbN7EgrsM/8uRPgIDUXc8ixjdDfADCvoiGIcbwDsP5QdDdBXUFapktBaR0YoEw6h0L6J BYsrlOjz+tTLR+o2ZMpuIuk3/oWtnpkOCo5IsDAK/cZTD8f70HvZPWAzUcJC8OPEWKHy LIRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RRtqQf3I36C6Z84pZRyf0W5jKf/UH7/3l/QwUUW+Z2IJWYr2Q XGYZIZ/zp7+SuW/2IDDzaiE0bXBMe9TY2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJU5sbPPXR6jGW6MkktFRl3A1qwaj7Ztk/AJ1YrdTtqm834bDtz0/FAngSg4EW89E/nHy19w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:de86:: with SMTP id w6mr7756249wrl.32.1612706948532; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm7472188wrv.75.2021.02.07.06.09.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:09:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:09:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6c6261aa-48cb-9c18-a3a9-a1998c00d134@proxmox.com> References: <20210105093536.1727641-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <20210105093536.1727641-15-aderumier@odiso.com> <6c6261aa-48cb-9c18-a3a9-a1998c00d134@proxmox.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.139 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 14/15] tests: add subnets tests X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:09:46 -0000 Le samedi 06 février 2021 à 14:56 +0100, Thomas Lamprecht a écrit : > I get some errors from this test, did not really investigated though. It was using the current running cluster sdn config instead the test sdn config. I have resend a fixed version.