From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A3A7C38A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:33:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D4D4C21F99
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:33:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 48DB421F8A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:33:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 114DC46A6C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:33:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <bf1c8b28-8881-e1ec-11db-de3c3196c992@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:33:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20211103155812.1461208-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211103155812.1461208-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.166 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v2 0/4] <add meta info and
 bandaid for QEMU 6.1 and unpinned q35 machine backward compat
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:33:21 -0000

On 03.11.21 16:58, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>   config: add new meta property withe creation time
>   config: meta: also save the QEMU version installed during creation
>   tests: cfg2cmd: add a few q35 related tests
>   cfg2cmd: switch off ACPI hotplug on bridges for q35 VMs


applied with Dominik's R-b/T-b and Wolfgang's A-b, thanks for checking this out!