From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE6938A8A3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:19:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B8D7548B5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:19:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:19:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D999142C82;
 Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <bde6dd39-882c-5dff-1681-6118c302d63b@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:19:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com
References: <20220622115206.3295425-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220622115206.3295425-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.041 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v7 qemu-server 00/10] cloudinit pending
 behaviour change
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:19:35 -0000

Am 22.06.22 um 13:51 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
> Hi,
> 
> This is an attempt to cleanup current behaviour of cloudinit online changes.
> 
> Currently, we setup cloudinit options as pending, until we generate the config drive.
> 
> This is not 100% true, because some option like vm name, nic mac address can be changed,
> without going to pending, so user can't known if it need to regenerated it.
> 
> Also, some can are very difficult to handle, if you hotplug a nic but it's failing,so pending,
> then you defined an ipconfig, and then you revert hotplug.
> or if you delete a nic, the ipconfig is no more displayed in the gui.
> 
> 
> So, instead of setting cloudinit values in pending,
> this patch serie copy the current cloudinit config in a new section [special:cloudinit],
> when the config drive is generated.
> This is only an hint, to allow to display diff between the generated cloudinit
> drive, and the current vm config.
> 
> A new specific cloudinit config api is added too displaying the diff between current and generated config.
> 
> Reminder: This need pve-manager depency bump first to check the version for live migration.

Without 10/10 and the version check in 03/10 adapted in accordance with
the above-mentioned bump (best done when applying):

Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>