From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9075B1FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:45:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F106311BFC;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:45:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <b9082e36-704a-4f62-916c-32a6586357bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:44:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20241114093226.814530-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20241114093226.814530-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <3d2ed5bd-e00c-4452-a60e-eb7a8cbf8ce1@proxmox.com>
 <78b274cf-2412-4290-90c5-a5c84bd9a4fa@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <78b274cf-2412-4290-90c5-a5c84bd9a4fa@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.016 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v5 02/12] plugin: dir: implement
 import content type
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 11/15/24 12:24, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> On 15.11.24 12:16 PM, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> On 14.11.24 10:32 AM, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>>> +
>>> +    my ($vtype, $name, undef, undef, undef, undef, $fmt) = $class->parse_volname($volname);
>>> +    die "invalid content type '$vtype'\n" if $vtype ne 'import';
>>> +    die "invalid format\n" if $fmt ne 'ova' && $fmt ne 'ovf';
>>
>> The $IMPORT_EXT_RE_1 regex doesn't include 'ova' anymore. Is it still
>> wanted here?
> 
> Okay, I guess strictly speaking it would go into the next patch ;)

ah ok, this probably happened on some rebase

since i probably have to send a v6 anyway, i'd move the ova check
in the next patch that includes ova in the IMPORT_EXT_RE_1 ?


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel