From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AE9902B4; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BD2BB4C9E; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 162EA442BA; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:54:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:106.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/106.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Dominik Csapak , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220713094317.2423116-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20220713094317.2423116-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220713094317.2423116-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [main.rs] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 4/4] file-restore: add 'format' and 'zstd' parameters to 'extract' command X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:54:20 -0000 Am 13/07/2022 um 11:43 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > if the target ist stdout, we can now specify the exact format by making use of > the new 'format' parameter of the restore daemons 'extract' api > > note that extracting a pxar from a source pxar (container/host backups) > won't work currently since we would have to reencode as pxar first > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak > --- > proxmox-file-restore/Cargo.toml | 1 + > proxmox-file-restore/src/block_driver.rs | 12 ++- > proxmox-file-restore/src/block_driver_qemu.rs | 15 +-- > proxmox-file-restore/src/main.rs | 100 +++++++++++++++--- > 4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > applied, with the addition of the proxmox-compression dependency to Cargo.toml squashed in, thanks!