From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CAB1FF13C for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:38:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CE82B708; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:38:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:38:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-network 06/16] evpn controller: allow multiple evpn controllers in a cluster To: Hannes Laimer , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260414163315.419384-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <20260414163315.419384-7-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <5lb37bax6ickaa5gxo2xy7457fjghbtxwwngikkk27buyog5a7@3k3jx3x6oao7> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <5lb37bax6ickaa5gxo2xy7457fjghbtxwwngikkk27buyog5a7@3k3jx3x6oao7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.688 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: CJRC3OA4GXAGETZM22G45WJM5ONVUC6J X-Message-ID-Hash: CJRC3OA4GXAGETZM22G45WJM5ONVUC6J X-MailFrom: s.hanreich@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 4/16/26 5:32 PM, Gabriel Goller wrote: > On 16.04.2026 17:30, Hannes Laimer wrote: >> On 2026-04-14 18:33, Stefan Hanreich wrote: >> if one has none, so the default('VTEP'), and the other sets 'VTEP', we >> miss that case here I think. something like >> ``` >> my $pg_self = $controller->{'peer-group-name'} // 'VTEP'; >> my $pg_other = $other_controller->{'peer-group-name'} // 'VTEP'; >> die "cannot have two controllers with ..." if $pg_self eq $pg_other; >> ``` >> might be better > > Maybe tangentially related: we should probably disallow VTEP as a bgp fabric > name. good catch! i'll fix it in the next version!