From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B47757FE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:39:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED68C195F8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:39:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7E9DE195EA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:39:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D33B45DEE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:39:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <b54b4c8e-7be6-4b84-250a-61881c181da8@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:39:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20211013105904.781248-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <ae2b0fde-f96d-4621-84d2-7d74ce247abc@proxmox.com> <YWfMrG5O5W2G1apv@gaia>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <YWfMrG5O5W2G1apv@gaia>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.205 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] pct: add section for supported
 distributions
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:39:17 -0000

On 14.10.21 08:22, Oguz Bektas wrote:
>> Hmm, I'd maybe avoid the list of exact release, tends to be outdated to fast
>> for some.
>>
>> Maybe we can link to the respective upstream release pages?
> i thought it'd make sense to have a list, but yeah i suppose we can link
> to their release pages. 
> 

I get where you come from, but I think we could generate a html page with the up-to-date
list in a table from the source of truth (aplindex on download server) and then link
to that once its available.

I need to make some changes there anyway (for ensuring that we can update the pve 7
index without touching the pve 6 one), and outputting a HTML table isn't to hard,
so maybe I can take a stab at that too while at it.