From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FFBBAD62 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:30:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A38130F72 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:30:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:30:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C2DB440DF8 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:30:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:30:17 +0100 From: Christoph Heiss To: Proxmox VE development discussion Message-ID: References: <20240311122938.565228-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240311122938.565228-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2 0/5] improve & unify installation(-related) documentation X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:30:19 -0000 v3: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-March/062314.html On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:29:06PM +0100, Christoph Heiss wrote: > This series in short tries to bring the documentation for the > ISO installation flow and anything related to it in line the with > respective documentation for PMG. As both products use the same > installer (minus small differences such as LVM options and BTRFS > support) and overall same basic system setup, it is worth unifying them. > > There is (of course) still room for improvement, esp. regarding the apt > repo/update section as pointed out by Alex. Still like to get this in > rather sooner than later, to not diverge even more. > > I'll send the appropriate pmg-docs series (see v1 of that [0]) when this > has been finalized & applied, to keep it transparent and easier to > reason about. > > [0] https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/2024-March/002870.html > > Revision history > ---------------- > v1: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-March/062056.html > > Notable changes v1 -> v2: > * dropped already-applied patches > * slight rewording in some places based on suggestions > > Christoph Heiss (5): > package-repos: improve wording partly based on pmg-docs > installation: iso: improve & align wording with pmg-docs > installation: lvm-options: improve & align wording with pmg-docs > installation: zfs-options: improve & align wording with pmg-docs > installation: iso: reflow location and password dialog screenshots > > pve-installation.adoc | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > pve-package-repos.adoc | 26 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >