From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66B4951BF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:04:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A6B8636A74
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:04:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:04:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A8B5044B71
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:04:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <b40f2b63-5d28-439a-b094-ceae29e0ffb0@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:04:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20230912122954.156735-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230912122954.156735-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 pve-zsync] parse disks: improve
 error messages
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:04:58 -0000

On 12/09/2023 14:29, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> The one with the backup flag was reported in the community forum:
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/77254/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
>     * Further improve message as suggested by Sterzy.
> 
>  pve-zsync | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

should this immediately bumped or is there some other patches, existing
or short-term planned? Just not that we forget this for too long now
(FWIW, feel free to do the bump yourself if you want).