From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF91860ADF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:29:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CE33718984
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:28:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1BBAD1897A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:28:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF50645573
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:28:56 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <6f181397-d66f-5a58-727d-674f36fedbc0@jochum.dev>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <b0246448-f712-fdfb-44f1-641c518c28a4@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:28:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/81.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6f181397-d66f-5a58-727d-674f36fedbc0@jochum.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.623 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.214 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Flutter App counts LXC offline containers wrong
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:29:28 -0000

Hi,

On 9/24/20 11:29 PM, René Jochum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have atm.:
> 
> 5 QEMU VM's
> 
>      3 - Running
> 
>      2 - Offline
> 
> 2 LXC Containers both running.
> 
> 
> It seems the App Counts "Offline LXC" wrong and in-cooperates QEMU
> online or something, it shows:
> 
> VM's:
> 
>      3 Online
> 
>      2 Offline
> 
> LXC's:
> 
>      2 Online
> 
>      3 Offline
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> René
> 
> 

i pushed a fix for this:

https://git.proxmox.com/?p=flutter/pve_flutter_frontend.git;a=commitdiff;h=25e03f156cb6ed278556249504b1db452bce18c2