From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41A095151
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC4C336511
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1822644C39
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <b00a1388-b634-489e-9dfb-81a66c651f09@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:07:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20240411092943.57377-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20240411092943.57377-11-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240411092943.57377-11-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH guest-common v3 10/22] vzdump: schema:
 make storage for fleecing semi-optional
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:08:04 -0000

On 11/04/2024 11:29, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> so it doesn't need to be set when explicitly disabling fleecing. Needs
> a custom verifier to enforce it being set when enabled.
> 
> Suggested-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!