From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF11C1FF0AF
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:29:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10C4921622;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:29:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:29:12 +0200
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs 07/15] pve-rs: fabrics: make per-fabric
 status queries VRF-aware
Message-ID: <attE9ZKjCo62Iza_@luna.proxmox.com>
References: <20260821140404.322081-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <20260821140404.322081-8-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <125e7833-c8e6-4cfa-a0d7-7d8daec2836e@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <125e7833-c8e6-4cfa-a0d7-7d8daec2836e@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20260504
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792754953302
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.250 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: QOIIVXRYRLWQBXXXXSPODRQMGHAGON7I
X-Message-ID-Hash: QOIIVXRYRLWQBXXXXSPODRQMGHAGON7I
X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On 21.10.2026 18:14, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> as already mentioned in the response to the cover letter, the VRF specific
> commands have a different format and fail to deserialize for OSPF
> neighbors and interfaces.

Missed this.
Fixed it, thanks.