From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A622A1FF0C1 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 78692214E4; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:04:17 +0200 From: Gabriel Goller To: Stefan Hanreich Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-common 1/3] iproute2: restructure get_physical_bridge_ports Message-ID: References: <20260709132857.239615-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <20260709132857.239615-2-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260709132857.239615-2-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20260504 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1789722258144 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.282 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: OAGWDSTW6MCIVBNRK6FYO7ZVZREOSC63 X-Message-ID-Hash: OAGWDSTW6MCIVBNRK6FYO7ZVZREOSC63 X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: One `make tidy` run away from greatness :( Otherwise LGTM. Reviewed-by: Gabriel Goller