From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF401FF0AE for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:03:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CFDD6214D9; Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:03:22 +0200 From: Gabriel Goller To: Daniel Herzig Subject: Re: [pve-network v2 0/4] make sure to use subnet config if available at point Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Herzig , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260831110116.300798-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260831110116.300798-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20260504 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788249799979 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.354 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: YBKMCBJTZACHMDLCT5RSZM3XLQTC4PP7 X-Message-ID-Hash: YBKMCBJTZACHMDLCT5RSZM3XLQTC4PP7 X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: For the record, I’ve been working on a patch that reads the config only once, when starting an apply or dry-run, and then passes it through the entire SDN config application process. The patch adds around 300 lines though and touches a lot of critical code, so it will take some time to polish. In the meantime, IMO we can merge this targeted subnet fix.