From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B677E7A6DE for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A5527A380 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 26608A36A for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id l13so11482438wru.11 for ; Sat, 08 May 2021 01:33:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=g0xlpprKniB60o6iKyPJ9W+19wTOtROS5wWWX+LrPg8=; b=hA6VKBX5qmpIrQY04c78mXnuK/y5gx7cfnuseK3O/6HkwCVwLJI45FAQpMMNywVFAv 0wrSk/MLKAUb3YuH/5DGPdcyCwbpcpoD6mM1s8qgF/kop4deZsnnog0Mac6cOAKC9PHt utm/SejMFKjHiydayOIWEqvDxr5j6sw/HHXOGbB90z887McgVZRFgc54fhbcPy+qxUlf Piay9e3QpuJ1a6BkPMTdza1kUGuw5pR1JaanlD4EqDuToOBhyZQqaRRnDrpx1qbtw83a Y2w6c5+YahYkSCthl6QJXuw16091ZyC3rzZ5TpUhRhqbvGHaASQiyhauVn5busjreUta SwBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=g0xlpprKniB60o6iKyPJ9W+19wTOtROS5wWWX+LrPg8=; b=mrGx+/zfNk0Vn7+9g5cm0vT/rsI/AZH8k+dGe9bHElGsCy/gE7gx39Pxgx+q/6VK1h 3KgfkP1JjiKIr36vmFoRnOCtUMm7Lndow+xtrJpGkEg7RbmrYrd0r7s8guLS20QvTaK8 cvYnc4OwjxJhD1OPLWRm1tpTOEdHFWEsdCNEUa8wY1T3e4dEUkik4u9YGnI7w6tReSIs QhOaRbU7DGtuV60henJ2wP7yV9JlQ28T2M2KOGZsXMsp4y3ctsQMZWjxcTdgfCqPmNwR lhta12MExWmbCwQwx57+2nbcAM2DLxUF240GJbxhodjE72V88niEcZV+pMxK34Y9ylu2 wtcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xve3dnvARNc2dCvx5GAhVaAgqxkX0uZFGfrDRM5iOCGslGQA3 cvfgdazgxi/SYH6PLBIDH+MKV3/nb9+DGaTa X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxytTdv2E77GzOlGrXhPJF40h6AQRKLS7uHk/2SpBI7TPJck0TjjGqs3hXgJmqKo+eXakn4sA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f5c6:: with SMTP id k6mr18789148wrp.338.1620462785639; Sat, 08 May 2021 01:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.50] ([79.132.252.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm12328136wro.23.2021.05.08.01.33.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 May 2021 01:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 10:33:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20210429225547.2272077-1-aderumier@odiso.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.103 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network] ipam: add custom plugins support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 08:33:12 -0000 Le mercredi 05 mai 2021 à 12:06 +0200, Thomas Lamprecht a écrit : > FYI, from a quick look this seems OK, but I'll wait at least until we > have VM and CT support ready before applying this. ok no problem. It was a request of a user forum, but it can't use it without VM && CT support anyway. I think we can work on CT support first, I'll rework my patches for review. and if it's ok, we can then work on VM support.