From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC4194F29
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:59:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D177430C4B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:58:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:58:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1D90441BB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:58:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <afec822e-6858-4a8a-bb07-554b27be6a90@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:58:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231213141747.679613-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20231213141747.679613-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v2 guest-common] replication
 improvements
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:59:12 -0000

Am 13.12.23 um 15:17 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Improve error when finding a common base snapshot and fix the check if
> a snapshot is needed by replication when there are volumes with
> replicate setting turned off.
> 
> First version:
> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-January/055513.html
> 
> Changes since v1:
>     * add an additional fix
> 
> Fiona Ebner (3):
>   replication: prepare: include volumes without snapshots in the result
>   replication: find common base: improve error when no common base
>     snapshot exists
>   abstract config: fix snapshot needed by replication check
> 
>  src/PVE/AbstractConfig.pm |  2 +-
>  src/PVE/Replication.pm    | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Ping