From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4980C1FF164
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 May 2025 10:47:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 41AB3166CB;
	Fri, 23 May 2025 10:47:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <af088711-d277-4bfa-8a8e-74d9686ea7fe@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 10:46:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>,
 "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250509141532.111458-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20250509141532.111458-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <eeb11ec08d36c3a6f5290134158e91ad7be8b432.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
 <4a2c8b00-4ba2-4c75-a9ce-779d3c8a1fdf@proxmox.com>
 <2efc51be0c973a3055e8214beef06ea9a1c6583b.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <2efc51be0c973a3055e8214beef06ea9a1c6583b.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC storage 1/3] plugin: add method to get qemu
 blockdevice options for volume
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 23.05.25 um 10:42 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre:
>>> no, the plan is to drop the storage plugin for it with Proxmox VE 9.
>>> We'll warn about it in the pve8to9 upgrade script. QEMU is expected
>>> to
>>> drop support with 10.1 in a few months. People that want to continue
>>> using it, can still configure it as a shared directory storage.
> 
> Ok, I wanted to know if we need to add qemu_blockdev_options in the
> plugin.
> 
> 
> BTW, it's missing qemu_blockdev_options for zfs over iscsi.  (it's the
> same than iscsi direct)

Good catch! I didn't get around to test all plugins yet, so I missed this.


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel