From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB8EC1FF164
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:33:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4E07B22F4;
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:33:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ac511c04-ddcd-4b4f-a857-fe399bd67d95@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:33:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20250314095221.69738-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250314095221.69738-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v2 1/2] isisd: fix bit flag
collision in options field
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On 14/03/2025 10:52, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> Resolve conflict between F_ISIS_UNIT_TEST and ISIS_OPT_DUMMY_AS_LOOPBACK
> which were both using the same bit value (0x01). This collision caused
> unit test mode to be unintentionally enabled when DUMMY_AS_LOOPBACK was set.
>
> Link: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/18377
> Fixes: ecf591e ("frr: add the dummy_as_loopback patch series, enable it by default")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
> ---
> ...d-option-to-treat-dummy-interfaces-as-loop.patch | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
applied both patches, thanks!
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel