From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D5A921CA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:53:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DF1F1E4A0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:53:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:53:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F21143C73
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:53:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <a9ecf27b-d1c2-e1f4-92dd-19f37ed99df0@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:53:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:111.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/111.0
Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20230313114354.94905-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230313114354.94905-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH qemu] add patches to fix
 regression with LSI SCSI controller
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:53:54 -0000

Am 13/03/2023 um 12:43 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> The patch 0008-memory-prevent-dma-reentracy-issues.patch introduced a
> regression for the LSI SCSI controller leading to boot failures [0],
> because, in its current form, it relies on reentrancy for a particular
> ram_io region.
> 
> [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/123843
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Needs these two patches first (for the numbering in the series file):
> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-March/056110.html
> 
>  ...isabling-re-entrancy-checking-per-MR.patch | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
>  ...le-reentrancy-detection-for-script-R.patch | 33 ++++++++++++++++
>  debian/patches/series                         |  2 +
>  3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0021-memory-Allow-disabling-re-entrancy-checking-per-MR.patch
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0022-lsi53c895a-disable-reentrancy-detection-for-script-R.patch
> 
>

applied, thanks!