From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A24F273ECE for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9755C4513 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7DDB94503 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 485CE4221A for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/101.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stoiko Ivanov References: <20220530183848.2816971-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> <20220530183848.2816971-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220530183848.2816971-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.248 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.476 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC pve-kernel 2/2] update ABI file for 5.15.35-2-pve X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 05:39:21 -0000 Am 30/05/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov: > (generated with debian/scripts/abi-generate) > > Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov > --- > abi-prev-5.15.35-1-pve | 26217 --------------------------------------- > abi-prev-5.15.35-2-pve | 26209 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 26209 insertions(+), 26217 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 abi-prev-5.15.35-1-pve > create mode 100644 abi-prev-5.15.35-2-pve There's no need ever to send those huge, auto-generated diffs out over the mailing list, especially if I only upload kernels I build myself and can generate and apply the abi directly from those packages, if I forget it just ping me, as I cannot and don't want to process such patches through the ML anyway. 3.6 MiB is far over the 80 KiB limit, always a good hint that something is off ;-)