From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6674F6CBD6 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:04:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 269FE2FE45 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:03:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9FD7A2FE39 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 64A8C44A83 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <a5b8645d-222c-06b0-c753-031242fdd0b3@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:03:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/93.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20210917130227.248852-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20210917130227.248852-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <e5484859-715a-7878-568e-c0b78431a9be@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <e5484859-715a-7878-568e-c0b78431a9be@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.250 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [dirplugin.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/6] dir plugin: update notes: don't attempt to remove non-existent notes X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:04:25 -0000 On 24.09.21 10:54, Dominik Csapak wrote: > On 9/17/21 15:02, Fabian Ebner wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> >> --- >> =C2=A0 PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm | 2 +- >> =C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm >> index 2267f11..0423e5f 100644 >> --- a/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm >> +++ b/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ sub update_volume_notes { >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (defined($notes) && $notes ne= '') { >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 PVE::Tools::file_set_contents($path, $n= otes); >> -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 } else { >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 } elsif (-e $path) { >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 unlink $path or die "could not delete n= otes - $!\n"; >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 } >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return; >> >=20 > nit: it is still racy, and imho the correct solution would be to > ignore the error but only if the file did not exists > iow $! is ENOENT >=20 > for most cases it's enough though and i am not sure if the > added complexity is worth it... IMO it's worth it and it's really not much complexity.. use POSIX; # or `use POSIX qw(ENOENT);` if we filter default-exports from= the POSIX module already unlink $path; die "could not delete notes - $!\n" if $! && $! !=3D ENOENT;