From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6718694EAB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4CC753064D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C5D644B02
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a5273106-8859-4759-886c-cdda67730e2a@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20240312115922.101416-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20240312115922.101416-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES qemu-server] improve error
 detection/messages for some block jobs
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:17:27 -0000

Am 12.03.24 um 12:59 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> When auto-dismiss=true (the default), a failed job can disappear very
> quickly from the job list and there might not be any chance to see the
> error in the result of 'query-block-jobs'. For jobs with $completion
> being 'auto', like 'block-stream', it couldn't even be detected that
> the job failed.
> 
> Jobs with auto-dismiss=false on the other hand, will wait in
> 'concluded' state until manually dismissed. For those, it will be
> possible to query the error if the job failed.
> 
> This series makes 'drive-mirror' and 'block-stream' jobs do just that.
> 
> There doesn't seem to be a way to have only failed jobs stay around,
> e.g. something like auto-dismiss=on-success.
> 

Superseded by a v2 also covering the new live-import:
https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-April/062845.html