From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D6962B6D for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:07:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16FD323107 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:06:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EA99D230F8 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:06:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD7544552B for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:06:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:06:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/85.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer References: <20201221151351.30575-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> <20201221151351.30575-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20201221151351.30575-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH manager 2/3] pvereport: rework report contents X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:07:02 -0000 On 21/12/2020 16:13, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > add: > * HA status > * ceph osd df tree > * ceph conf file and conf db > * ceph versions > > removed: > * ceph status, as pveceph status is now printing the same information > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer > --- > > @Thomas, we did discuss using the cluster/ceph/metadata endpoint off > list for more information about running services and other stuff like > needed restarts after updates. > > Since it returns a lot of JSON that needs to be filtered to be useful > and not littering the report, I will need a bit more time to see what > would be needed and how to filter for that. yes, sure, that's what I said when proposing it - so yes, a filter is required. You could take a look at the web interface for relevant keys, there we use that information already. > > For now with the changed pveceph status (ceph -s) output we already get > an overview if any expected services are not running and with `ceph > versions` we get an idea which versions and if multiple versions are > present in the cluster. > > I think this is okay for now to get a good impression and quite a lot > more hints where to investigate further. I mean you get at least the running versions, which is probably the most important thing, so this is fine for me for now. > > PVE/Report.pm | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > applied, thanks!