From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AD81FF176
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:44:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EA3C65EFA;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:44:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <a4154a19-4432-4ec8-b890-101175376b6c@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:44:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20250219111740.200819-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
 <20250219111740.200819-4-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250219111740.200819-4-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.294 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URI_NOVOWEL               0.5 URI hostname has long non-vowel sequence
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 4/7] btrfs: forcefully set image
 to readwrite
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

I want to apply the series with a small follow-up, i.e.

>     btrfs: avoid superfluous check in foreach_snapshot_of_subvol() helper
>     
>     The helper iterates with the BTRFS_SNAPSHOT_REGEX regular expression,
>     so there will always be a snapshot name.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> index a28996c..e47f25e 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> @@ -417,7 +417,6 @@ my sub foreach_snapshot_of_subvol : prototype($$) {
>         my ($volume, $name, $snap_name) = ($1, $2, $3);
>         return if !path_is_subvolume("$dir/$volume");
>         return if $name ne $basename;
> -       return if !defined $snap_name;
>         $code->($snap_name);
>      });
>  }

but I need to ask about this patch first.

Am 19.02.25 um 12:17 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval:
> When a subvolume is transferred via btrfs send/receive the resulting
> image contains the received_uuid property set. This property is required
> to do incremental snapshots.
> 
> A downside though is that once the received_uuid property is set, it is
> not possible to make the image readwrite again without the force (-f)
> flag, and in such case the received_uuid property is lost. Since we know
> the images are only set to rw for the duration of the move, it is safe
> to set the flag forcefully and then in a future commit add the
> received_uuid property by force.

What do you mean exactly with "add the received_uuid property by force"?
What would the command for that be? Just want to make sure we don't
block our way to support incremental export/import later (it's broken
right now [0], but we might want to implement it at some point).

[0]:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250221154111.73194-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/T/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> index 7dec6e8..9fc51ef 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ sub volume_import {
>  	# Rotate the disk into place, first the current state:
>  	# Note that read-only subvolumes cannot be moved into different directories, but for the
>  	# "current" state we also want a writable copy, so start with that:
> -	$class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot", 'ro', 'false']);
> +	$class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', '-f', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot", 'ro', 'false']);
>  	PVE::Tools::renameat2(
>  	    -1,
>  	    "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot",
> @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ sub volume_import {
>  
>  	# Now go through the remaining snapshots (if any)
>  	foreach my $snap (@snapshots) {
> -	    $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap", 'ro', 'false']);
> +	    $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', '-f', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap", 'ro', 'false']);
>  	    PVE::Tools::renameat2(
>  		-1,
>  		"$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap",



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel