From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6458E1FF17C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F52210CF7;
	Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:53:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a40663aa-2e55-4f6c-a3a8-4b4b95d810bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:52:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>,
 Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
References: <20250611144903.200940-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <20250611144903.200940-7-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <f3xma7zwv72win7idxnw3eeh2mpqjiqtq2ljpibqywqrdjxfty@wg2lpuht5q36>
 <45gnrfy7d6nagilkveaxtlheupun47joxoym57ziyro4clylqo@asl2nxfooulu>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <45gnrfy7d6nagilkveaxtlheupun47joxoym57ziyro4clylqo@asl2nxfooulu>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.683 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 06/11] configure static IP in
 LXC config for custom entrypoint
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 6/25/25 10:30, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:26:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Filip Schauer wrote:
>>> When a container uses the default `/sbin/init` entrypoint, network
>>
>> I'm not a fan of this logic, also because it does not support 'dhcp' (in
>> which case it should IMO fail instead).
> 
> (Missed that there will be a dhcp patch - that one could revert the
> error message then - I'd still prefer to have an error initially here.
> Anyway, the point about having a property to control this behavior still
> stands.)

I think that resolves the point w.r.t SDN then as well?

>> But maybe we can figure out an IP if SDN is in use to support the dhcp
>> case if there are static/permanent leases? (@Stefan?)


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel