From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B941FF15E for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0E82215C7B; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:02:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1760364138; x=1760968938; d=canarybit.eu; s=rsa1; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to: subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from; bh=Pob2lp+mbkOofuZXgTspzSykZPNvm9aO09UbiSqCFb8=; b=Sj7GBGgoO+OUAl/Y9hN+WRLubxHFS3sRE2raifN8h0WCIxl9+qHeyV/eJbI9iCnPoMefli9/kMSUg wZ/uCWUYX9a681/iWiIFWGMVgG48NuFb9ZXieqY8UPHJvw+0DNlcZTT8FBPsgWSph+kJYlcGJ+MPdO gZ6R8DdrgBoWB08LqViWdJK62b2f8uV6yf/8pPDIFdxlMYN8ppucp4rxbdBqgV+6g7eu/UNGj2y4df yVebHwC5ZTNzcy+27efYwQpJfJToYxxPODWRk62Vps44s5SnO6L4m9NuIl3SQlmqRPGdiuZ0KrY9bx eCCCDbi4I5Y9a99JszI1rQwpPLAUDmg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1760364138; x=1760968938; d=canarybit.eu; s=ed1; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to: subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from; bh=Pob2lp+mbkOofuZXgTspzSykZPNvm9aO09UbiSqCFb8=; b=legYFvFxvVIaqq5532T2ehYoTWFCq5wPXoJ/kTZ7GpkB35mL5ESTUs8F/Na6GgLzgo28DtjpxZor+ caucDB/Dg== X-HalOne-ID: 3a6da4f8-a83d-11f0-b779-c9fa7b04d629 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:02:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Fiona Ebner , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20251001151237.50385-1-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> <20251001151237.50385-3-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> <29a9f159-a7eb-4dc8-8d2e-1836497467ce@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Anton Iacobaeus In-Reply-To: <29a9f159-a7eb-4dc8-8d2e-1836497467ce@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [canarybit.eu] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware v2 2/3] Add firmware target for TDFV X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Philipp Giersfeld Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 10/7/25 17:24, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 04.10.25 um 3:23 PM schrieb Anton Iacobaeus: >> From: Philipp Giersfeld >> >> TDVF enables UEFI support for TDX virtual machines. Add a build target >> to build TDFV in Config-B (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/tree/master/OvmfPkg/IntelTdx#configurations-and-features) > > Would be great to have a 1-2 sentences for the rationale why this > variant was chosen in the commit message. I suppose because the other > one isn't fully featured? > >> Signed-off-by: Philipp Giersfeld >> Signed-off-by: Anton Iacobaeus > > Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner > That is exactly right, I will add some details to the commit message. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel