From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793BE9909B for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:17:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D40B15BB3 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:17:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from sender3-of-o58.zoho.com (sender3-of-o58.zoho.com [136.143.184.58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:17:24 +0100 (CET) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1699891318; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=W7aY9x0BLiTjQG685iNPKSizaV55dvSGvy26wZNiCYo/wpnqY56NFa0e+0Jet41powxXbR1kHERTbdrHAcYup04C5d1avYE2FY88eO3VTbZHQOsFyptsw2iq8vKL071lcyPmEuVu8UrCcgpLQjRzQ/sJKkjBYBa4ZzwhOysQNAY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1699891318; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=mdiBz5fXviH3Fn8z0llBj71IKP8qbms6UP1IrTymwJk=; b=CTig39hKE/S0psoJT5BL5RD1GSCQiG2o3mLXh6QjZE9K1jUp2L53JGRmj0LBT0i0zSKj87vbGbTRfXGLVVvz+rw447wb0B3GyGWSlJXxaf91mKYHC1UtcQLi6tPtVfrXiRBpFz3ZeN59QgjB706riT2fyL5Q0uLTqB7hP/Mei/4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=lamprecht.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thomas@lamprecht.org; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1699891318; s=zoho; d=lamprecht.org; i=thomas@lamprecht.org; h=Message-ID:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Subject:To:To:References:From:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=mdiBz5fXviH3Fn8z0llBj71IKP8qbms6UP1IrTymwJk=; b=j+CHOxVwap+gTuxnrus13bITfTF+QXdfETDJfhdPqn1EjFL7p79+a0B58tLScUHS FtDnphc+ME9+bIHx1GRagYKuiueHr44EPX3kbIaSwSKWwJgYm/pQJa6cmxjluI6X1+s f0qS5LPWNvH5mWez6NKo8seZq+m84iJQ7jZzFqIg= Received: from [192.168.30.235] (94.136.29.99 [94.136.29.99]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1699891315748931.4091271224875; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:01:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:01:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer References: <20230822090456.929773-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20230822090456.929773-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 ARC_SIGNED 0.001 Message has a ARC signature ARC_VALID 0.001 Message has a valid ARC signature BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 Excellent reputation (+5) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] applied.series: [PATCH storage/widget-toolkit 0/2] List all OSDs on disk X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:17:25 -0000 Am 22/08/2023 um 11:04 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > It is possible to have multiple OSD daemons on a single disk. This is > useful if fast NVME drives are used to utilize their full potential. > > For these situations we want to list all OSD daemons that are located on > the disk in the disk panel of the node. > > I added a new 'osdid-list' parameter to the Disks GET API endpoint for > this. > We can probably deprecate/remove the 'osdid' the next time we can > introduce breaking API changes. > > storage: Aaron Lauterer (1): > disks: get: add osdid-list return parameter > > src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm | 6 +++- > src/PVE/Diskmanage.pm | 10 ++++++ > .../disk_tests/cciss/disklist_expected.json | 1 + > .../hdd_smart/disklist_expected.json | 2 ++ > .../nvme_smart/disklist_expected.json | 1 + > .../disk_tests/sas/disklist_expected.json | 1 + > .../disk_tests/sas_ssd/disklist_expected.json | 1 + > .../ssd_smart/disklist_expected.json | 5 +++ > .../disk_tests/usages/disklist_expected.json | 32 +++++++++++++------ > 9 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > widget-toolkit: Aaron Lauterer (1): > DiskList: render osdid-list if present > > src/panel/DiskList.js | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > applied series, thanks!