From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE827121A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jun 2022 12:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD46268F0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jun 2022 12:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 495E168E5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jun 2022 12:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F8EA43693;
 Wed,  8 Jun 2022 12:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a12ccb84-5b72-6fb4-0e18-c8010deae4b2@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 12:14:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com
References: <20220516160719.3818057-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220516160719.3818057-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.925 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.732 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v5 qemu-server 0/9] cloudinit pending
 behaviour change
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:15:11 -0000

Am 16.05.22 um 18:07 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
> Changelog v5:
> 
> - move cloudinit fast_plug_option generation outside vmconfig_hotplug_pending
> - remove cloudinit section from vm_config api
> - vzdump : skip cloudinit section 
> - migration: check target node version && forbid migration if too old && cloudinit section exist.
> 
The last three patches should come before the first one, because they
are preparing the introduction of the new section.

The version checking approach works for migration, but with HA stealing
or manual config move, the issue with config parsing is still there. But
that's not too big of an issue IMHO.