From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A64195F4 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:43:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 63EB5995E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:43:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:43:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C49E45DF2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:43:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <a0bf371d-7e3e-7012-6daa-5ce2cb09ea3e@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:43:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:111.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/111.0 Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20230308120919.1646218-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> <82701573-4e32-550a-7842-d7b2b815754f@proxmox.com> <380337b9-49aa-7fb6-3e29-8f751f6aa2be@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <380337b9-49aa-7fb6-3e29-8f751f6aa2be@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 manager 0/2] ui: ceph: improve discoverability of warning details X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 16:43:30 -0000 Am 08/03/2023 um 17:38 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: >> That said, why not avoid the tooltip but inline the info by moving the severity to >> the right, dropping the info button completely and making the grid row expandable, >> i.e., like the PMG tracking center grid does? > > We thought about it, but initially I wasn't too happy about it, because if the detailed error message has many lines and/or long lines, it would be nicer to just open the window and making it as large as possible. You could still have a open-in window there if we really want, copy-button can help too for some "copy to support/forum/text-editor-for-searching" - as at least I use this mostly to get a quick overview or to extract info. One advantage of expansion: you can have all errors in view, not just one at a time (or well, per tab ^^)