From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1AB761EE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:10:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B89A1D854
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:10:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C97251D845
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:10:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F88F4686C;
 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:10:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a05631b5-2910-a0f0-f264-b8aea3b124c2@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:10:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <Alexandre.DERUMIER@groupe-cyllene.com>
References: <20211011125520.1124937-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
 <20211011125520.1124937-4-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
 <2244d2ac46c8e62230060e66d374b1f69b1115cf.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <2244d2ac46c8e62230060e66d374b1f69b1115cf.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.203 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/3] ui: add 'win11' ostype and set
 defaults in wizard
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:10:55 -0000

Hi,

On 18.10.21 07:57, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote:
> I don't think that win2022 require tpm , only win11.

seems so, but do you think it will hurt if we default to one (in GUI) anyway?
I mean it's only a check box to tick off if one does not wants it.

As otherwise it would add a bit of complication, we'd need to add a separate
win2022 os type just for that.