From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E138071BDF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 10:04:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A3D691038D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 10:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 32DA11036F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 10:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 080D142F61
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 10:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:03:56 +0200
From: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <YodLbHr7wpUu/f1E@gaia>
Mail-Followup-To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>,
 Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20220519084816.193338-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <c175eac4-b9c9-dbe9-2a93-bdb4d65ab903@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c175eac4-b9c9-dbe9-2a93-bdb4d65ab903@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.498 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v5 manager] ui: vm network: allow to
 override MTU for virtio devices
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 08:04:28 -0000

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 19/05/2022 10:48, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> > we already have the 'mtu' option in the API, so we can just expose
> > that option inside the 'Advanced' menu for virtio network interfaces.
> > 
> > Reviewed-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> > Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> > Tested-By: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
> 
> aren't those from two version previous with some change in between, or
> did they re-test / re-review this in private?
> As IMO it's not really correct to let one believe that this exact version
> was tested by two people.

sorry for the confusion, the tags were leftover from the previous
commits

> 
> Functionality wise it looks Ok, a few final layout and code style nits
> I'd still like to see inline.


i've addressed the nits in the v6.

though i don't think the 
> "Use the special value '1' to inherit the MTU from the underlying bridge"
is the best, since the user won't see this message until they've
selected '1' as a value.

regardless, i've made the changes you asked for

- oguz